I constantly encounter statements like, “I use Apple because of the data privacy,” or “There are no viruses under Linux,” and so on and so forth. In real life, I just chuckle to myself and refrain from replying. These people are usually devotees of a particular brand, which they worship and would even defend with their lives. Therefore, I save my energy for more worthwhile things, like writing this article.

My aim is to use as few technical details and jargon as possible so that people without a technical background can also access this topic. Certainly, some skeptics might demand proof to support my claims. To them, I say that there are plenty of keywords for each statement that you can use to search for yourself and find plenty of primary sources that exist outside of AI and Wikipedia.

When one ponders what freedom truly means, one often encounters statements like: “Freedom is doing what you want without infringing on the freedom of others.” This definition also includes the fact that confidential information should remain confidential. However, efforts to maintain this confidentiality existed long before the availability of electronic communication devices. It is no coincidence that there is an age-old art called cryptography, which renders messages transmitted via insecure channels incomprehensible to the uninitiated. The fact that the desire to know other people’s thoughts is very old is also reflected in the saying that the two oldest professions of humankind are prostitution and espionage. Therefore, one might ask: Why should this be any different in the age of communication?

Particularly thoughtless individuals approach the topic with the attitude that they have nothing to hide anyway, so why should they bother with their own privacy? I personally belong to the group of people who consider this attitude very dangerous, as it opens the floodgates to abuse by power-hungry groups. Everyone has areas of their life that they don’t want dragged into the public eye. These might include specific sexual preferences, infidelity to a partner, or a penchant for gambling—things that can quickly shatter a seemingly perfect facade of moral integrity.

In East Germany, many people believed they were too insignificant for the notorious domestic intelligence service, the Stasi, to be interested in them. The opening of the Stasi files after German reunification demonstrated just how wrong they were. In this context, I would like to point out the existing legal framework in the EU, which boasts achievements such as hate speech laws, chat monitoring, and data retention. The private sector also has ample reason to learn more about every individual. This allows them to manipulate people effectively and encourage them to purchase services and products. One goal of companies is to determine the optimal price for their products and services, thus maximizing profit. This is achieved through methods of psychology. Or do you really believe that products like a phone that can take photos are truly worth the price they’re charged? So we see: there are plenty of reasons why personal data can indeed be highly valuable. Let’s therefore take a look at the many technological half-truths circulating in the public sphere. I’ve heard many of these half-truths from technology professionals themselves, who haven’t questioned many things.

Before I delve into the details, I’d like to make one essential point. There is no such thing as secure and private communication when electronic devices are involved. Anyone wanting to have a truly confidential conversation would have to go to an open field in strong winds, with a visibility of at least 100 meters, and cover their mouth while speaking. Of course, I realize that microphones could be hidden there as well. This statement is meant to be illustrative and demonstrates how difficult it is to create a truly confidential environment.

Let’s start with the popular brand Apple. Many Apple users believe their devices are particularly secure. This is only true to the extent that strangers attempting to gain unauthorized access to the devices face significant obstacles. The operating systems incorporate numerous mechanisms that allow users to block applications and content, for example, on their phones.

Microsoft is no different and goes several steps further. Ever since the internet became widely available, there has been much speculation about what telemetry data users send to the parent company via Windows. Windows 11 takes things to a whole new level, recording every keystroke and taking a screenshot every few seconds. Supposedly, this data is only stored locally on the computer. Of course, you can believe that if you like, but even if it were true, it’s a massive security vulnerability. Any hacker who compromises a Windows 11 computer can then read this data and gain access to online banking and all sorts of other accounts.

Furthermore, Windows 11 refuses to run on supposedly outdated processors. The fact that Windows has always been very resource-intensive is nothing new. However, the reason for the restriction to older CPUs is different. Newer generation CPUs have a so-called security feature that allows the computer to be uniquely identified and deactivated via the internet. The key term here is Pluton Security Processor with the Trusted Platform Module (TPM 2.0).

The extent of Microsoft’s desire to collect all possible information about its users is also demonstrated by the changes to its terms and conditions around 2022. These included a new section granting Microsoft permission to use all data obtained through its products to train artificial intelligence. Furthermore, Microsoft reserves the right to exclude users from all Microsoft products if hate speech is detected.

But don’t worry, Microsoft isn’t the only company with such disclaimers in its terms and conditions. Social media platforms like Meta, better known for its Facebook and WhatsApp products, and the communication platform Zoom also operate similarly. The list of such applications is, of course, much longer. Everyone is invited to imagine the possibilities that the things already described offer.

I’ve already mentioned Apple as problematic in the area of ​​security and privacy. But Android, Google’s operating system for smart TVs and phones, also gives enormous scope for criticism. It’s not entirely without reason that you can no longer remove the batteries from these phones. Android behaves just like Windows and sends all sorts of telemetry data to its parent company. Add to that the scandal involving manufacturer Samsung, which came to light in 2025. They had a hidden Israeli program called AppCloud on their devices, the purpose of which can only be guessed at. Perhaps it’s also worth remembering when, in 2023, pagers exploded for many Palestinians and other people declared enemies by Israel. It’s no secret in the security community that Israel is at the forefront of cybersecurity and cyberattacks.

Another issue with phones is the use of so-called messengers. Besides well-known ones like WhatsApp and Telegram, there are also a few niche solutions like Signal and Session. All these applications claim end-to-end encryption for secure communication. It’s true that hackers have difficulty accessing information when they only intercept network traffic. However, what happens to the message after successful transmission and decryption on the target device is a different matter entirely. How else can the meta terms and conditions, with their already included clauses, be explained?

Considering all the aforementioned facts, it’s no wonder that many devices, such as Apple, Windows, and Android, have implemented forced updates. Of course, not everything is about total control. The issue of resilience, which allows devices to age prematurely in order to replace them with newer models, is another reason.

Of course, there are also plenty of options that promise their users exceptional security. First and foremost is the free and open-source operating system Linux. There are many different Linux distributions, and not all of them prioritize security and privacy equally. The Ubuntu distribution, published by Canonical, regularly receives criticism. For example, around 2013, the Unity desktop was riddled with ads, which drew considerable backlash. The notion that there are no viruses under Linux is also a myth. They certainly exist, and the antivirus scanner for Linux is called ClamAV; however, its use is less widespread due to the lower number of home installations compared to Windows. Furthermore, Linux users are still often perceived as somewhat nerdy and less likely to click on suspicious links. But those who have installed all the great applications like Skype, Dropbox, AI agents, and so on under Linux don’t actually have any improved security compared to the Big Tech industry.

The situation is similar with so-called “debugged” smartphones. Here, too, the available hardware, which is heavily regulated, is a problem. But everyday usability also often reveals limitations. These limitations are already evident within families and among friends, who are often reliant on WhatsApp and similar apps. Even online banking can present significant challenges, as banks, for security reasons, only offer their apps through the verified Google Play Store.

As you can see, this topic is quite extensive, and I haven’t even listed all the points, nor have I delved into them in great depth. I hope, however, that I’ve been able to raise awareness, at least to the point that smartphones shouldn’t be taken everywhere, and that more time should be spent in real life with other people, free from all these technological devices.

Does someone really need to write about passwords again? – Of course not, but I’ll do it anyway. The topic of secure passwords is a perennial topic for a reason. In this constant game of cat and mouse between hackers and users, there’s only one viable solution: staying on top of things. Faster computers and the availability of AI systems are constantly reshuffling the deck. In cryptography, there’s an unwritten rule that simply keeping information secret isn’t sufficient protection. Rather, the algorithm for keeping it secret should be disclosed, and its security should be proven mathematically.

Security researchers are currently observing a trend toward using artificial intelligence to guess supposedly secure passwords. So far, one rule has been established when dealing with passwords: the longer a password, the more difficult it is to guess. We can test this fact with a simple combination lock. A three-digit combination lock has exactly 1,000 possible combinations. Now, the effort required to manually try all the numbers from 000 to 999 is quite manageable and, with a little skill, can be solved in less than 30 minutes. If you change the combination lock from three to five digits, this work multiplies, and finding the solution in less than 30 minutes becomes more a matter of luck, especially if the combination is in the lower number range. Security is further increased if each digit allows not only numbers from 0 to 9, but also letters, both upper and lower case.

This small and simple example shows how the ‘vicious circle’ works. Faster computers allow for trying out possible combinations in a shorter time, so the number of possible combinations must be driven immeasurably with the least possible effort. While in the early 2000s, eight digits with numbers and letters were sufficient, today it should ideally be 22 digits with numbers, upper and lower case, including special characters. Proton lumo’s AI makes the following recommendation:

• Length at least 22 characters
• Mixture: Uppercase/lowercase letters, numbers, special characters, underscore

A practical example of a secure password would be: R3gen!Berg_2025$Flug.

Here we see the first vulnerability. No one can remember such passwords. At work, someone might give you a password policy that you have to follow – oh well, that’s a shame, live with it! But don’t worry, there’s a life hack for everything.

That’s why it’s still common for employees to keep their passwords in close proximity to their PCs. Yes, they still keep them on little slips of paper under the keyboard or as Post-it notes on the edge of the screen. As an IT technician, when I want to log into a coworker’s PC while they’re not at their desk, I still glance over the edge of the screen and then look under the keyboard.

How do I know it’s the password? Sure! I look for a sequence of uppercase and lowercase letters, numbers, and special characters. If there were a Post-it stuck to the edge of my screen with, for example, the inscription “Wed Foot Care 10:45,” I wouldn’t even recognize it as a password at first.

So, as a password, “Wed Foot Care 10:45” would be 16 characters long, with upper and lower case letters, numbers, and special characters. Perfect! And at first, it wouldn’t even be recognizable as a password. By the way: The note should have as little dust or patina as possible.

In everyday working life, there are also such nice peculiarities that you have to change your password monthly, and the new password must not have been used in the last few months. Here, too, employees came up with solutions such as password01, password02, and so on, until all 12 months were completed. So there was an extended verification process, and now it had to contain a certain number of different characters.

But even in our private lives, we shouldn’t take the topic of secure passwords lightly. The services we regularly log in to have become an important part of many people’s lives. Online banking and social media are important points here. The number of online accounts is constantly growing. Of course, it’s clear that you shouldn’t recycle your passwords. So you should use multiple passwords. How best to go about this—how many and how to structure them—is something everyone has to decide for themselves, of course, in a way that suits them personally. But we’re not memory masters, and the less often we need a particular password, the harder it is for us to remember it. Password managers can help.

Password managers

The good old filing cabinet. By the way, battery life: infinite. Even if that might seem unworthy of a computer nerd, it’s still possibly the most effective way to store passwords at home.

With today’s number of passwords, management software is certainly attractive, but there’s a risk that if someone gains control of the software, they could have you – as our American friends colloquially say, “by the balls” – loosely translated into German: in a stranglehold. This rule applies especially to cloud solutions that seem convenient at first glance.

For Linux and Windows, however, there is a solution you can install on your computer to manage the many passwords of your online accounts. This software is called KeePass, is open source, and can also be used legally and free of charge in a commercial setting. This so-called password store stores the passwords encrypted on your hard drive. Of course, it’s quite tedious to copy and paste the login details from the password manager on every website. A small browser plugin called TUSK KeePass can help here. It’s available for all common browsers, including Brave, Firefox, and Opera. Even if other people are looking over your shoulder, your password will never be displayed in plain text. Copying and pasting will also delete it from your clipboard after a few minutes.

It’s a completely different story when you’re on the go and have to work on someone else’s computer. In your personal life, it’s a good idea to adapt passwords to the circumstances, depending on where you use them. Let’s say you want to log into your email account on a PC, but you may not be able to guarantee that you’re not being watched at all times.

At this point, it would certainly be counterproductive to dig out a cheat sheet with a password written down that follows the recommended guidelines: uppercase and lowercase letters, numbers, special characters, including Japanese and Cyrillic, if possible, which you then type character by character with your index finger using the eagle search system.

If you’re not too bad at typing, meaning you can type a bit faster, you should use a password that you can type in 1-1.5 seconds. This will overwhelm a normal observer, especially if you use the Shift key discreetly while typing. You draw attention to your right hand while typing and discreetly use the Shift or Alt keys occasionally with your left hand.

Perhaps, at a cautious assessment, the leaking of your personal Tetris high score list doesn’t constitute a security-relevant loss. Access to online banking is a completely different matter. It’s therefore certainly sensible to use a separate password for financial transactions, a different one for less critical logins, and a simple one for “run-of-the-mill” registrations.

If you have the option to create alias email addresses, this is also very useful, since logging in usually requires not only a password but also an email address. If possible, having a unique email address there, created only for the corresponding site, can not only increase security but also give you the opportunity to become unreachable if you wish. Every now and then, for example, it happens that I receive advertisements, even though I’ve explicitly opted out of advertising. Strangely enough, these are usually the same ‘birds’ who, for example, don’t stick to their payment terms, which they promised before registration. So I simply take the most effective route and delete the alias email address → and that’s it!

Memorability

I’d also like to say a few words about the memorability of passwords. As we’ve seen in the article, it’s a good idea to use a different password for each online account, if possible. This way, we can avoid having our login to Facebook and other social media accounts affected if Sony’s PlayStation Store is hacked again and all customer data is stolen. Of course, there are now multi-factor authentication, authentication, and many other security solutions, but operators don’t always take care of them. Moreover, the motto in hacker circles is: Every problem has a solution.

To create a marketable password that meets all security criteria, we’ll use a simple approach. Our password consists of a very complex static part that, if possible, avoids any personal reference. As a mnemonic, we can use the image of an image, as in the initial example: a combination of an image (“Regen Berg”) and a year, complemented by another word (“Flug”). It’s also very popular to randomly replace letters with similar-looking numbers, such as replacing the E with a 3 or the I with a 1. To avoid limiting the number of possibilities and ensuring that all E’s are now a 3, we won’t do this for all E’s. This results in a static password part that might look like this: R3gen!Berg_2025$Flug. This static part is easy to remember. If we now need a password for our X login, we supplement the static part with a dynamic segment that applies only to our X account. The static part can be easily introduced with a special character like # and then supplemented with the reference to the login. This could look like this: sOCIAL.med1a-X. As mentioned several times, this is an idea that everyone can adapt to their own needs.

In conclusion

At work, you should always be aware that whoever logs into your account is also acting on your behalf. That is, under your identity.

It’s logical that things sometimes run much more smoothly if a colleague can just “check in” on you. The likelihood of this coming back to haunt you is certainly low as long as they handle your password carefully.

Of course, you shouldn’t underestimate the issue of passwords in general, but even if you lose a password: Life on the planet as we know it won’t change significantly. At least not because of that. I promise!

Articels

Blockchain – an introduction

Elmar Dott Dec 29, 2025

Subscription

Harvest Time

Elmar Dott Dec 8, 2025

Articels

Cryptography – more than just coincidence

Elmar Dott Oct 27, 2025